Furthermore, any idiot who can see can read a DMM. Fact of the matter is, you can build DMMs cheaper, they can be made more accurate and more precise. Durability does factor in as well, though a lot of cheap digital multimeters are pretty easy to blow up, and most of the good analog meters were/are pretty tough. With multimeters it's mostly a mixture of cost, accuracy and ease of use. The way they work is the needle is really just the end of a large coil that alters it’s bend slightly moving the meter. I was thinking the things might possibly be made like thermostats which have a Dial. You could very well be right about it just being fashion for some stuff. Car speedometers attempted digital and failed. With those analog meters could be easily blown and digital ones couldn’t. Knobs, switches and meters aren't considered "cool", so we end up with touch screens with slow display updating rates and shitty menu-driven UIs. Nowadays everybody wants to interface with everything the way they do their smartphone. They tend to be less precise than digital readouts, but for most applications where they were used that's a non-issue. As I mentioned in my other post, getting the ballistics right is tricky, but the OP probably doesn't care about that.Īnalog meter movements have largely died out because they aren't fashionable. Nothing in particular about analog VU meters that's expensive to make, aside from the relatively tight manufacturing tolerances.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |